Laertes

1.Laertes is a reckless guy now, since the death of his father and sister.
2. His goals in each scene are pretty much based around revenge against Hamlet for killing his father. I think this all just amplifies his hate for Hamlet, who he already disliked.
3. I'd say he's pretty tight, every one he liked is pretty much dead and he's gonna try to kill hamlet soon. I'd say that sums up his feelings nicely.
4. I think the King feels like he's like, really emotional and is the kind of person who needs to be calmed down a lot.
5. I don't really know he's just kind of talking with people. I guess he's helping the King plan Hamlets assassination.
6. Well we do learn that every one is now planning on killing Hamlet, so I'd say that's kind of significant. Maybe not too important to the dynamic of the play though.
7. I'm just trying to figure out if he's actually going to kill Hamlet or if Hamlet will beat him to the punch and kill every one.
8. I was wondering when every one was going to get sick of Hamlet being so weird and I guess this is how the Dutch solve their issues.

Hamlet thus far

so I don't feel like making all these different posts for all these different parts of the same book, so here I go.

Hamlet. Hamlet Hamlet Hamlet. Pooor Hamlet. It is unfortunate, the life he leads. The constant surprise to me in all the shakespear plays that I've read in school is that the only concerns they have are social. Oh poor me, My mother married my uncle, oh boo-hoo. What about food? How about all the other swiss or dutch what ever they are who aren't eating when this was written? Oh, I guess the royal prince just forgot about them while he complained that his life is meaningless. I am about as tired of hearing him mope about everything in his lief about as sick as I am of commercials during scrubs. God damn. In a lot of ways Hamlet reminds me of Iago from Othello. He is very cunning, and plans most things three steps ahead. The only difference is he doesn't tell the audience all about about it when the other characters leave the stage like Iago does.

I like that better though.

Act One Scene 1-2

I am rather un opinionated by Hamlet (shocking I know) but I'm going to try and focus on what is important to me in hamlet.
Death in Hamlet so far is focused on the late King, who haunts the castle. What a nuisance! Although this is similar to the feelings presented to Hamlet. It appears that his fathers death literally haunts him, it follows him day in and day out with no signs of leaving him. Maybe once the ghost vanishes he'll be less sad.
Another thing, I don't think hamlet likes his mother. Part of me feels like there is some kind of lng lasting hostility between them, even before she married his uncle.

The Stranger

This book has raised many, many questions for me. It has raised only questions though about how other people think. Mersualt as a character has opened my eyes to other peoples thoughts, I have always considered others feelings and opinions, but never their actual thoughts. Mersualt has a very lazy thought process, drifting calmly from thought to thought in his own personal random patterns. He is always calm in his emotions through situations that may be stressful or an "incredible annoyance" until in the final chapter he snaps and floods all of his most personal thoughts to the priest. It is hard from this stand point to figure out if he is truly an upset or disturbed person or if he is as content and happy as he seemed. I think probably that in section one he was happy, and he was content, but in section two he becomes depressed and sad.

The Stranger post 1

First of all I'd like to say the stranger so far is quite dry, he goes through the motions of his day with a few new, exciting, or interesting things happening. I think those new experiences are there to illustrate his detachment from things that actually really matter, or are pretty serious. We all feel detached from certain events, but regardless, this is an extreme. Some times, I don't care about my Moms job even though it's pretty important that her and her boss got into a big fight or something.

I don't yet know what Camus wants this character to be. Or what reaction we are supposed to get from him, or how he actually feels about these events and people he meets. Camus seems to illustrate what he's thinking and what he's saying in a very straight forward manner, but it confuses me still because I am having trouble putting my fingers on the characters. Mersualt in himself is an extreme, nothing matters why even care kind of thing. But he does still miss his mother, and seems disappointed Marie vanishes in the morning after they sleep together. He is quite confusing. The only other characters we really get to know slightly are the Director and Raymond. The Director is peaceful, and doesn't stand out (which is how Camus wanted) but Raymond stands out, violently. Raymond talks about beating his mistress and all this hate and anger and it's kind of like pop rocks on my brain when he speaks, because I didn't know Albert Camus was going to put such a strange guy ON TOP OF this already strange character.

Do we live in a word that is meaningful and makes sense?

Sometimes, I’d like to believe so and sometimes I would like to believe it is not. I personally think that we make things happen for a reason, but when we throw faith and caution to the wind and let life take the reigns that’s what happens.
I believe things are connected but not in the “Everything is the same, even if it’s different.” Way. That’s just a little silly to me, considering it defies everything I’ve been told since a young age. People tell you, no that’s not a table, that’s a basketball. Not, oh yeah, that tables a ball. Cool right? No no no no no. Wrong wrong wrong. A ball is not a table, but a cup is a bowl. Do not let any one tell you otherwise. It’s just a little wide. Some people get a little frustrating when it comes to beliefs like this, because sometimes I do indeed feel extreme about my views on things like this. I think we all do. But in certain connections, those little ones, you can’t say that there is no connection at all. What do you call a coincident then? Or true love?
Certain thing I guess can’t be connected though. Like things that never witness each other, like a chimpanzee and a pine tree. But they are both living, so there is a connection there. You can always connect things, but things can’t connect themselves with out knowing about them, like we can’t connect our selves with Martians because WE DON’T KNOW IF THEY ARE REAL! Fun right? I think that’s why existentialism is confusing, because in my mind I keep running myself in circles about my thoughts and feelings. In any sense though it’s how we look at it though. Believe what makes you happy.

To Shirly,
I think you're on an interesting track with illusions, because really it sounds cheesy but what if this all is an illusion? The Matrix man. Or something like that. Crazy crazy. This exixtentialism stuff seems very much about your mind and less about your life, which is what I though it was all gonna be about with all this what does it mean stuff.

To Brianna,
I really liked how you broke everything down, it made your unique ideas very clear cut and precise. You also showed a very powerful understanding of the text, and I liked that. It was nice, and very easy to understand. It made all these ideas that are normally very confusing much easier to understand.